<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I support 90 days maternity leave for women employees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teresakok.com/2010/03/10/i-support-90-days-maternity-leave-for-women-employees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teresakok.com/2010/03/10/i-support-90-days-maternity-leave-for-women-employees/</link>
	<description>Teresa Kok (郭素沁) is working effectively for Seputeh and Kinrara</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:06:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee wee tak</title>
		<link>http://teresakok.com/2010/03/10/i-support-90-days-maternity-leave-for-women-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-6045</link>
		<dc:creator>lee wee tak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teresakok.com/?p=5820#comment-6045</guid>
		<description>i think 60 days is ok but must have a cap...perhaps for the first 3 or so babies....this is meant for people who practice family planning otherwise one would end up with women working only 9 months a year.

if the lady is, e.g., earning RM12,000 per annum or RM1,000 a month then her basic is really RM1,333.33 per month...it has to be fair to employers and employees as well as affecting employers&#039; hiring decision

I am all for women&#039;s right but just becareful we do not venture too much into 1 direction

if this 90 days encourage wanton reproduction then families could end up with empasis in quantity and not quality - and for quantities, guys, you know what I mean...put a lid over before matters coming to a head, please. be responsible be thoughtful and there are other ways for fun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think 60 days is ok but must have a cap&#8230;perhaps for the first 3 or so babies&#8230;.this is meant for people who practice family planning otherwise one would end up with women working only 9 months a year.</p>
<p>if the lady is, e.g., earning RM12,000 per annum or RM1,000 a month then her basic is really RM1,333.33 per month&#8230;it has to be fair to employers and employees as well as affecting employers&#8217; hiring decision</p>
<p>I am all for women&#8217;s right but just becareful we do not venture too much into 1 direction</p>
<p>if this 90 days encourage wanton reproduction then families could end up with empasis in quantity and not quality &#8211; and for quantities, guys, you know what I mean&#8230;put a lid over before matters coming to a head, please. be responsible be thoughtful and there are other ways for fun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
