<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hishamuddin Hussein and Nazri Abdul Aziz&#8217;s response to my parliament questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teresakok.com/2009/10/21/hishamuddin-hussein-and-nazri-abdul-azizs-response-to-my-parliament-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teresakok.com/2009/10/21/hishamuddin-hussein-and-nazri-abdul-azizs-response-to-my-parliament-questions/</link>
	<description>Teresa Kok (郭素沁) is working effectively for Seputeh and Kinrara</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee wee tak</title>
		<link>http://teresakok.com/2009/10/21/hishamuddin-hussein-and-nazri-abdul-azizs-response-to-my-parliament-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-5537</link>
		<dc:creator>lee wee tak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teresakok.com/?p=4443#comment-5537</guid>
		<description>1) allowing the law to stay but not applying it consistently suggest  a weapon to kept for situation as and when needed

the law was enacted at a time when women were regarded as property / chattel of men, something that is unthinkable now

perhaps Hisham thinks also since that there is no profit for him to revamp the law let&#039;s look elsewhere

2) what do you mean &quot;discredit&quot;? we already know MACC has conveyed some cruel experience to witnesses only. I shrudder to think what they would do to suspects. Teoh Beng Hock, Mr Wong (Ronnie Liu&#039;s PA) and the Indian chap who appeared at the Inquest

MACC has goofed up big time and it is them that is seeking sympathy. Do I sympathise with MACC? Is Ron Jeremy a virgin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) allowing the law to stay but not applying it consistently suggest  a weapon to kept for situation as and when needed</p>
<p>the law was enacted at a time when women were regarded as property / chattel of men, something that is unthinkable now</p>
<p>perhaps Hisham thinks also since that there is no profit for him to revamp the law let&#8217;s look elsewhere</p>
<p>2) what do you mean &#8220;discredit&#8221;? we already know MACC has conveyed some cruel experience to witnesses only. I shrudder to think what they would do to suspects. Teoh Beng Hock, Mr Wong (Ronnie Liu&#8217;s PA) and the Indian chap who appeared at the Inquest</p>
<p>MACC has goofed up big time and it is them that is seeking sympathy. Do I sympathise with MACC? Is Ron Jeremy a virgin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Warren</title>
		<link>http://teresakok.com/2009/10/21/hishamuddin-hussein-and-nazri-abdul-azizs-response-to-my-parliament-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-5516</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teresakok.com/?p=4443#comment-5516</guid>
		<description>Err..Wasn&#039;t Rosmah married to someone else when Najib met her ....and then.....enticed her?

Or was it that he was married to someone else and she had enticed him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err..Wasn&#8217;t Rosmah married to someone else when Najib met her &#8230;.and then&#8230;..enticed her?</p>
<p>Or was it that he was married to someone else and she had enticed him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
