<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soalan Parlimen &#8211; Energy Security ~Langkah Kerajaan Memperkenalkan Bahan Api Ke-5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teresakok.com/2008/11/07/soalan-parlimen-energy-security-langkah-kerajaan-memperkenalkan-bahan-api-ke-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teresakok.com/2008/11/07/soalan-parlimen-energy-security-langkah-kerajaan-memperkenalkan-bahan-api-ke-5/</link>
	<description>Teresa Kok (郭素沁) is working effectively for Seputeh and Kinrara</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:26:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ventura</title>
		<link>http://teresakok.com/2008/11/07/soalan-parlimen-energy-security-langkah-kerajaan-memperkenalkan-bahan-api-ke-5/comment-page-1/#comment-4131</link>
		<dc:creator>ventura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 09:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teresakok.com/?p=1819#comment-4131</guid>
		<description>It is good that the government has explored various mean of energy to increase the capacity and ever usage of rising cost vis as vis to the demand that required.

Our main consent is the operating cost that is presented here. The cost of 14% reduction is it base on total production cost includes primary cost of investment or just a mere total operating cost excluding the investment cost expanded. So there is a part of question that needs to be clarified and understand. This must be produce with a substantial report and verification or else this report may just be a report to show what generally any shareholders want to see and expect. This will be include in the part of effectiveness of the operation via input verses output.

Apart from the costing aspect what is the capacity that the total fuel base on the various resources are functioning? We believe various resources of energy generated will have difference type of capacity in comparison to the maintenance and operating cost rendered. This is expressing in term of efficiency. In percentages to the variable assigned to view the general probability of effectiveness.

Since we have only a single monopolistic non competitor in the allocation of energy by TNB. The mean of counter-check and balance is just a mere book-keeping and statement recording. Therefore constant verification and monitoring is to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness is the truth as proclaimed and reported.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is good that the government has explored various mean of energy to increase the capacity and ever usage of rising cost vis as vis to the demand that required.</p>
<p>Our main consent is the operating cost that is presented here. The cost of 14% reduction is it base on total production cost includes primary cost of investment or just a mere total operating cost excluding the investment cost expanded. So there is a part of question that needs to be clarified and understand. This must be produce with a substantial report and verification or else this report may just be a report to show what generally any shareholders want to see and expect. This will be include in the part of effectiveness of the operation via input verses output.</p>
<p>Apart from the costing aspect what is the capacity that the total fuel base on the various resources are functioning? We believe various resources of energy generated will have difference type of capacity in comparison to the maintenance and operating cost rendered. This is expressing in term of efficiency. In percentages to the variable assigned to view the general probability of effectiveness.</p>
<p>Since we have only a single monopolistic non competitor in the allocation of energy by TNB. The mean of counter-check and balance is just a mere book-keeping and statement recording. Therefore constant verification and monitoring is to ensure the efficiency and effectiveness is the truth as proclaimed and reported.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eagle</title>
		<link>http://teresakok.com/2008/11/07/soalan-parlimen-energy-security-langkah-kerajaan-memperkenalkan-bahan-api-ke-5/comment-page-1/#comment-4127</link>
		<dc:creator>eagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teresakok.com/?p=1819#comment-4127</guid>
		<description>Reading through the answer provided, no wonder Malaysia is so &#039;Kelam kabut&quot;. No depth, no strategic vision. As I see it, the answer provided is &quot;Melepaskan batuk di tangga&quot;.
There are many experts out there, but our government likes to keep thing to themselves, thinking that they have the best brain.
I bet you YB, if the country is facing real threat- natural or man made disaster, we will be in turmoil with the whole nation in the state of confusion.
If I may suggest that you pick one strategic issue on the interest of the nation now and future, form up any volunteer group to conduct an in-depth study, with some research, push it at state and federal level for follow up action and implementation. Just thinking aloud, but the real issue who are really hands on, over the issue you brought up and who really monitor them, not just talk as everything ok but the truth is situation normal but all fuck up. Don&#039;t believe me next year ask the same question, you get the same answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading through the answer provided, no wonder Malaysia is so &#8216;Kelam kabut&#8221;. No depth, no strategic vision. As I see it, the answer provided is &#8220;Melepaskan batuk di tangga&#8221;.<br />
There are many experts out there, but our government likes to keep thing to themselves, thinking that they have the best brain.<br />
I bet you YB, if the country is facing real threat- natural or man made disaster, we will be in turmoil with the whole nation in the state of confusion.<br />
If I may suggest that you pick one strategic issue on the interest of the nation now and future, form up any volunteer group to conduct an in-depth study, with some research, push it at state and federal level for follow up action and implementation. Just thinking aloud, but the real issue who are really hands on, over the issue you brought up and who really monitor them, not just talk as everything ok but the truth is situation normal but all fuck up. Don&#8217;t believe me next year ask the same question, you get the same answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hasbullah Pit</title>
		<link>http://teresakok.com/2008/11/07/soalan-parlimen-energy-security-langkah-kerajaan-memperkenalkan-bahan-api-ke-5/comment-page-1/#comment-4126</link>
		<dc:creator>Hasbullah Pit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teresakok.com/?p=1819#comment-4126</guid>
		<description>Hairan Juga kenapa sumber tenaga angin tidak diperkatakan oleh BN mahupun PR.

cuba cerita sikit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hairan Juga kenapa sumber tenaga angin tidak diperkatakan oleh BN mahupun PR.</p>
<p>cuba cerita sikit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
