<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soalan Parlimen &#8211; Mengapa AirAsia tidak dibenarkan terbang ke mana-mana destinasi yang dikehendakinya?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teresakok.com/2008/11/03/soalan-parlimen-mengapa-airasia-tidak-dibenarkan-terbang-ke-mana-mana-destinasi-yang-dikehendakinya/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teresakok.com/2008/11/03/soalan-parlimen-mengapa-airasia-tidak-dibenarkan-terbang-ke-mana-mana-destinasi-yang-dikehendakinya/</link>
	<description>Teresa Kok (郭素沁) is working effectively for Seputeh and Kinrara</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:33:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lee wee tak</title>
		<link>http://teresakok.com/2008/11/03/soalan-parlimen-mengapa-airasia-tidak-dibenarkan-terbang-ke-mana-mana-destinasi-yang-dikehendakinya/comment-page-1/#comment-4108</link>
		<dc:creator>lee wee tak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teresakok.com/?p=1778#comment-4108</guid>
		<description>&quot;kebenaran tersebut adalah tertakluk kepada hak-hak trafik yang dipersetujui antara Malaysia dan negara-negara lain.&quot;

a multi billion ringgit matter answer really, in 14 words

I cannot understand what this highly paid civil servant said. Such is the quality of the answers, commitment, competency and intellect on display.

For goodness sake, can you elaborate on what&#039;s that &quot;hak-hak&quot;? 

Is that a state sponsored monopoly on our part to limit competition to MAS from within Malaysia  hence at the expense of Malaysians? 

Is the agreement open to re-negotiation and at what cost? 

Has the government considered giving MAS a bit of competition to the benefit of consumers and lower down the cost of business in Malaysia to allow companies to save cost and hopefully (no chance!) to lower the price of their goods and services?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;kebenaran tersebut adalah tertakluk kepada hak-hak trafik yang dipersetujui antara Malaysia dan negara-negara lain.&#8221;</p>
<p>a multi billion ringgit matter answer really, in 14 words</p>
<p>I cannot understand what this highly paid civil servant said. Such is the quality of the answers, commitment, competency and intellect on display.</p>
<p>For goodness sake, can you elaborate on what&#8217;s that &#8220;hak-hak&#8221;? </p>
<p>Is that a state sponsored monopoly on our part to limit competition to MAS from within Malaysia  hence at the expense of Malaysians? </p>
<p>Is the agreement open to re-negotiation and at what cost? </p>
<p>Has the government considered giving MAS a bit of competition to the benefit of consumers and lower down the cost of business in Malaysia to allow companies to save cost and hopefully (no chance!) to lower the price of their goods and services?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ventura</title>
		<link>http://teresakok.com/2008/11/03/soalan-parlimen-mengapa-airasia-tidak-dibenarkan-terbang-ke-mana-mana-destinasi-yang-dikehendakinya/comment-page-1/#comment-4101</link>
		<dc:creator>ventura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teresakok.com/?p=1778#comment-4101</guid>
		<description>Both side of the party explanation is just mere hearsay. Should back up by a statistical support both the LCCT capacity and also the Air Asia flight ground statistical report of the passengers. 

After that only conclusion through the data’s can decides because to have own airport is costly and will definitely increase the cost, as on the contrary of reduces the cost. One airport concept both on ground and technical service and maintenance facilities can be shared this will further reduces the cost. 

Apart from that social problems will comes in, like; land that may needed home will have to go, sound and disturbance by aircraft carriers, unforeseen circumstances and tragedy risk involve and limited forestry clearance and land that have to be thought about for future generation.

The solution for the ticket price to reduce is to increase efficiency through more competition of aircraft providers and increase the demands of the frequency of travelling by flight both domestic and international. 

Government intervention on policies and reduction of aircraft maintenance and good of direct and indirect influence to the parts and daily consumption will have be debated and considered.

Example definitely price of fuel have a large impact on the cost of aircraft carrier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both side of the party explanation is just mere hearsay. Should back up by a statistical support both the LCCT capacity and also the Air Asia flight ground statistical report of the passengers. </p>
<p>After that only conclusion through the data’s can decides because to have own airport is costly and will definitely increase the cost, as on the contrary of reduces the cost. One airport concept both on ground and technical service and maintenance facilities can be shared this will further reduces the cost. </p>
<p>Apart from that social problems will comes in, like; land that may needed home will have to go, sound and disturbance by aircraft carriers, unforeseen circumstances and tragedy risk involve and limited forestry clearance and land that have to be thought about for future generation.</p>
<p>The solution for the ticket price to reduce is to increase efficiency through more competition of aircraft providers and increase the demands of the frequency of travelling by flight both domestic and international. </p>
<p>Government intervention on policies and reduction of aircraft maintenance and good of direct and indirect influence to the parts and daily consumption will have be debated and considered.</p>
<p>Example definitely price of fuel have a large impact on the cost of aircraft carrier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LKY</title>
		<link>http://teresakok.com/2008/11/03/soalan-parlimen-mengapa-airasia-tidak-dibenarkan-terbang-ke-mana-mana-destinasi-yang-dikehendakinya/comment-page-1/#comment-4097</link>
		<dc:creator>LKY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teresakok.com/?p=1778#comment-4097</guid>
		<description>Dear  YB

Khairy is one of the political force in Air Asia.
Sure you want to do this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear  YB</p>
<p>Khairy is one of the political force in Air Asia.<br />
Sure you want to do this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
