Well, the people listen, eat and enjoy whatever was given to them. But when it comes to excercising their voting rights, they have their own ideas. Thats the reason why pas was nearly defeated in 2004.

What I’m trying to stress is that the people knows.

the “term mature” democracy is coined by me and I have given you 10 points about it in a previous thread. Also I have emailed you a 3 page excel word to explain 1 of the 10 points.

If you must, one of my tenets is that people can say whatever they want as long as they do not threaten physical harm. We must respect other people’ right to say/do whatever they want as long as it does not bring harm.

As per the moderator, you can go there, makan, decide listen to ceramah or not. This is also a chance for PR to explain their thoughts to people and to enable their point of view to go through because chances as controlled MSM won’t publish what they will say there, anyway.

This is also a chance for you to practice democracy – listening to other people’s opinion and decide for yourself, whether you agree/disagree with them and perhaps explain to them too, why you disagree. Or even better, if you can learn new things that you can agree with.

But y must u use the term ‘rumah terbuka’ if u derailed its modus operandi?

Is this the opposition politician style of mature democracy?

(The ceramah is the entertainment for the evening. But seriously, it’s a open house cum ceramah. Everyone is welcome to the open house and nobody has to stay for the ceramah if they choose not to.) Moderator